-
2x2500k would cost less, would consume less power and would have the same or a bit better result...
-
-
Content visible to registered users Only ! Click here to Register !
I didn't say that four q6600 is the best solution.
I just said that your result is good. Of course if you have money to buy two new i5's than you should go for it.
-
-
-
Win95 x32 / Vray 2.00.01 / Max 2011 x32 /Celeron 1.3 GHz overclocked to 1.6GHz/ 1GB RAM DDR1 / Rendertime = 6 Hours 49 Minutes
Win98 x32 / Vray 1.5 SP4a / Max 2011 x32 /Celeron 1.3 GHz overclocked to 1.6GHz / 2 GB RAM DDR1 / Rendertime = 6 Hours 19 Minutes
-
Post Thanks / Like
uthit Thanked for this post
-
-
Content visible to registered users Only ! Click here to Register !
that is why you don't buy i7 970. I would always go for the intel mainstream like i5 2500k. it costs about 195 eur, what is just a little bit more than AMD 1100T's price. Intel is more overclockable and it uses less electricity. So on the long run if electricity cost and performance gain is calculated into the price, Intel is cheaper that AMD.
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
Here's mine:
Intel Core i7 Extreme 980X @ 4.2GHz: 4 min 10 sec
Intel Core i7 2600K @ 4.6GHz: 5 min 10 sec
Quite okay for single CPU workstations.
The 2600K is of course the best choice for it's money / performance...
Cheers...
Last edited by HarryPotter; 01-14-2012 at 03:44 PM.
Reason: Sorry... That was a 2600K, not a 2700K... My bad...
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
Content visible to registered users Only ! Click here to Register !
This is not "refraction problem". This is coplanar faces VRayPlane01+Transpare0. move Transpare0 upper a little 0,0000001mm
-

Win 7 x64 Ultimate / Vray Adv 2.10.01 / 3ds max 2012 x64 /Intel Core i5 760 @ 4250MHz / 8GB RAM /ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series
/ Render time : 11 minutes 19,9 seconds
-
-
Well...
2 minutes slower in a 5 minute scene may not be much, but in a 3 hours per frame scene, that's about half an hour slower.
That's a huge impact in render time, cause when you have to render a 2.000 frames sequence, every second you gain in render speed counts!
-
Windows 7 64 / Vray 2.10.01 / Max 2012 64bit / i7 2500k@4.5Ghz / 8GB RAM / Rendertime : 7 minutes 11.4 seconds
-
Content visible to registered users Only ! Click here to Register !
hm. I believe that i2500k has the best price/performance ratio. It is more easily overclockable. and about 100eur cheaper.
-
The 2 minutes difference between the i2500K and the i2600K is something i would pay 100$ to avoid...
-
Content visible to registered users Only ! Click here to Register !
yes that is correct but i5 is more overclockable than i7 and after OC advantage is much smaller.
-
Content visible to registered users Only ! Click here to Register !
which CPU you have?
i5 2500k or i7 2600k or i72700k?
Last edited by mzex; 01-15-2012 at 04:31 PM.
-
I used a meter to measure the power consumption of my 4 pcs (3xq6600,1xq8300 at 3 Ghz) -> 810 Watts ... OUCH OUCH OUCH
Last edited by kotlousko; 01-26-2012 at 05:48 AM.
-
Post Thanks / Like
uthit Thanked for this post
-
with vray 2.10.01 - W7 x64, 12GB. I7-920 @ 3,8Ghz (currently on air), GF460, 0h 6m 58,5s
-
Vray 2.10.01 / Max 2012 64bit /AMD Phenom II X4 945 3.0 GHz / 12 gig ram / Gforce 480 GTX / = 17min 04 sec.
-
3ds Max 2011 x64 - Vray 1.5 SP5
Intel Core i7-2600 3.40 GHz and 12 GB Ram - 6min 46 sec
3ds Max 2011 x64 - Vray 2.10.01 ( some refraction problems appeared )
Intel Core i7-2600 3.40 GHz and 12 GB Ram - 6min 52 sec
3ds Max 2011 x64 - Vray 2.20.03
Intel Core i7-2600 3.40 GHz and 12 GB Ram - 6min 34 sec
Last edited by rinon; 02-05-2012 at 01:28 AM.
-
has anyone tested the FX8120 (185€) in this scene?
-
Operating System / Vray Version / 3dsmax version / CPU / Ghz of CPU (stock or O/C) / RAM / Rendertime of that scene you posted
windows 7 x64 / vray 2.10 / 3ds Max 2012 x64 / intel Core i7-3930K Hexa-core (6 core) / 3.2 Ghz / 6 Gb Ram / 3m 12sg
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
Content visible to registered users Only ! Click here to Register !
compared to post #123, 3930K is more than twice as faster compared to i7 2600k.
according to this article this is not the case with 3930k. It is only 25% faster than 2600k. So that would be 5min15s for your CPU. In your case it renders like you have two i7 2600k.
can you please rerun the test.
I am in search for the new CPU, so if this is the case with 3930k, than it is appealing product.
here's the guy with the same CPU as yours:
Content visible to registered users Only ! Click here to Register !
his time on stock is 5min6,9s, this is a big difference.
Last edited by mzex; 01-31-2012 at 01:33 PM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules